March 26, 2012: Today the Supreme Court will hear the 1st in 3 days of arguments from representatives of 26 states, a business group and individual parties who claim that the health care reform legislation signed into law 2 years ago by President Obama is unconstitutional.
A significant point of quarrel in the legislation is a personal medicare mandate, that will call for every person to acquire individual medicare or encounter a tax penalty for failing to do so, beginning in 2014.
However, the Anti-Injunction Act, composed in the 19th century, disallows testing a tax until the rate for it is actually due. If the Supreme Court mentions the Anti-Injunction Act as a precedent, the obstacle to this certain piece of the Person Protection and Affordable Care Act could not be heard until April 15, 2015, when the 1st penalties might be due.
Although, the root problem around this case is whether a personal medicare mandate is even constitutional. Challengers of the law are saying there has certainly never ever been a demand to purchase an item or service before and that allowing it might result in boosted federal government breach in individuals\'s lives.
If the Supreme Court decides that the individual medicare mandate is unconstitutional, the next problem is if any other pieces of the health reform laws can stand on their own, because they were created on the principle that individual mandate was legal.
The health care business is set to change rapidly, yet any choices may not take outcome for months or years while millions of Americans are trying to find economical medicare now.
First Preferred provides preexisting conditions insurance deals, medical insurance for children, coverage for diabetic issues, high blood pressure medicare and countless other kinds of reliable coverage. Contact us today to learn even more about our deals and pick the best one for your needs.