Welcome to Delicate template
Header
Just another WordPress site
Header

Joint NGO Submission

The 14th Session of the Universal Periodic Review (UPR)
Republic of Korea

23 April 2012

Submitted by

The Korean NGO Coalition
for the 2nd Cycle of the UPR on the Republic of Korea

The 53 Korean NGOs participating in the preparation of the submission are as follows:

Advocates for Public Interest Law (APIL), Alliance for Enactment of Anti-Discrimination Act, Association of Korea Doctors for Health Rights, Association of Physicians for Humanism, Catholic Human Rights Committee (CHRC), Chingusai – Korean Gay Men’s Human Rights Group, Collective for Sexually Minor Cultures Pinks (PINKS), Cultural Action, Dandelions group of Korean parents who lost children to intercountry adoption, Disability and Human rights in Action (Footact), Human Asia, Human Rights Education Center DEUL (DEUL), International Child Rights Center (InCRC), Joint Committee with Migrants in Korea (JCMK), Korea Campaign to Ban Landmines (KCBL), Korea Center for United Nations Human Rights Policy (KOCUN), Korean Confederation of Trade Union (KCTU), Korean Dentists Association for Healthy Society, Korean Federation of Medical Groups for Health Rights (KFHR), Korean Government Employees’ Union (KGEU), Korean House for International Solidarity (KHIS), Korean Pharmacists for Democratic Society (KPDS), Korean Progressive Network Jinbonet (JINBONET), Korean Public Interest Lawyers’ Group (Gong-Gam), Korean Sexual-Minority Culture and Rights Center (KSCRC), Korea Sexual Violence Relief Center (KSVRC), Korea Solidarity for Conscientious Objection (KSCO), Korean Teachers and Education Workers Union (KTU), Korean Unwed Mothers and Families’ Association (KUMFA), Korea Women’s Association United (KWAU), Korean Women Workers Association (KWWA), Ewha Lesbian Rights Group, Lesbian Gay Bisexual Transgender Asexual Intersexual Questionary and You (LGBTAIQ), LGBT Human Rights Committee in HanYang University, KoRoot, Lesbian Counseling Center in South Korea, MINBYUN-Lawyers for a Democratic Society (MINBYUN), Minkahyup, My Sister’s Place-Durebang Shelter (Durebang), NANCEN Center for Refugee’s Rights (NANCEN), National Union of Mediaworkers, Peace Sharing Association (PSA), People’s Solidarity for Participatory Democracy (PSPD), SARANGBANG Group for Human Rights (SARANGBANG), Rainbow Action Against Sexual-Minority Discrimination, Save the Children Korea, Solidarity for LGBT Human Rights of Korea (DoingInRyun), Solidarity for Workers’ Health, The Center for Military Human Rights, Korea (CMHRK), The Korean Council for the Women Drafted for Military Sexual Slavery by Japan, Truth and Reconciliation for the Adoption Community of Korea (TRACK), Unninetwork, World Without War

The Secretariat of the Korean NGO Coalition
Advocate for Public Interest Law (APIL), Korea Center for United Nations Human Rights Policy (KOCUN), MINBYUN-Lawyers for a Democratic Society, People’s Solidarity for Participatory Democracy (PSPD)
I. BACKGROUND AND FRAMEWORK

1. This submission was jointly written by 53 NGOs based in the Republic of Korea (ROK). The submission aims to evaluate the implementation of the recommendations from the 1st cycle of the Universal Periodic Review (UPR) and to raise awareness regarding the situation of human rights in the ROK since 2008.

A. Scope of international obligations and implementation (Recommendation No. 1, 2 )

2. The ROK Government had reservations on the Article 22 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, Article 25 of the International Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, and Article 21 of the Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC). In addition, the Government has yet to ratify the International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance, the Optional Protocol to the Convention against Torture (OP-CAT), the International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families, the Hague Adoption Convention, and the core ILO conventions related to freedom of association and collective bargaining, and elimination of forced and compulsory labour. As for the implementation of the international treaties of which the ROK has ratified, there have been less than ten cases where human rights treaties or other international human rights norms have been cited in the decisions of the Constitutional Court or other court rulings, in all of which the norms referred to are used as supplementary grounds, at best, for such decisions and rulings. The Government should ratify the treaties of which it is not a state party and withdraw all of the reservations.

3. The Government has failed to actively disseminate the observations made by treaty bodies other than posting the results of individual complaints in the Official Gazette. Furthermore, the Government has not actively engaged in disseminating the recommendations from the 1st cycle of the UPR and has held only one panel discussion with civil society. At this panel discussion, the Government mistranslated a considerable number of the UPR recommendations when presenting them to civil society representatives.

B. National Human Rights Commission of Korea

4. In 2009, the Government downsized the National Human Rights Commission of Korea (NHRCK) by 21% and appointed a chairperson lacking experience and expertise in the field of human rights. Since then, the Commission has deferred its decisions on several serious human rights violation cases, where timely interventions by the Commission were crucial. These series of events have threatened the independence of the Commission and led to the simultaneous resignation of two standing commissioners and seventy advisors and experts in 2010.

C. Policy Measures – National Action Plan (NAP)

5. The Government excluded NGOs from participating in the implementation and evaluation process of the 1st NAP (2007-2011) and during the recent process of creating the 2nd NAP (2012-2015). The Government held a public hearing without adequate notification to the NGOs. As for the 1st NAP, no specific implementation took place regarding the National Security Act, the Security Surveillance Act, the Assembly and Demonstration Act, the death penalty, and alternative military service.

II. IMPLEMENTATION OF INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS OBLIGATIONS

A. Equality and non-discrimination

6. Enactment of comprehensive anti-discrimination legislation (Recommendation No. 23): Although the Ministry of Justice maintains that it has been working on enacting anti-discrimination legislation since 2007, there has been no visible progress. The Ministry launched a “Special Committee for Anti-Discrimination Legislation” in 2010, but there has been no progress even after the special committee was dissolved at the end of 2010. The Prohibiting and Protecting against Gender Discrimination Act was repealed in 2005 and article 92(5) of the Military Criminal Code, which penalizes male homosexuals in the military, still exists. The Government must enact a comprehensive legislation which addresses all prohibited grounds of discrimination in concrete terms, through consultation with civil society and key stakeholders.

B. Right to life, liberty and security of the person

7. Death Penalty (Recommendation No. 20, 27): The Government, while maintaining a moratorium on the use of the death penalty, has not made any concrete efforts to abolish the death penalty. Instead, it uses results of public opinion polls for not abolishing the death penalty. The polls are usually conducted right after a serial killing or child sexual abuse cases has been aired in the media. The Government should conduct a national campaign against and abolish the death penalty.

8. Prohibition of Corporal Punishment in Schools and at Home (Recommendation No. 29): In 2011, the Government amended the Enforcement Decree of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (Enforcement Decree) to prohibit ‘inflicting pain upon students by using tools and/or parts of the body.’ However, even without using tools or parts of the body, corporal punishment is still possible including in the use of group punishment. The Seoul Student Rights Ordinance is the minimum legal basis of protecting the rights of students, and each local government has already legislated or is now legislating its own Student Rights Ordinance in line with the principles stipulated in the CRC. However, on 27 February 2011, the elementary and secondary school regulations clause of the Enforcement Decree was amended and the Seoul Student Rights Ordinance, which is subordinate to the Enforcement Decree, became unavailing. Also, the number of suspected cases of domestic child abuse increases each year , but only 5.1 % of the reported child abuse cases develop into criminal cases by the actual accusation. In addition, no child-sensitive procedures were introduced to child-related criminal procedures. The Government should amend laws to ban all forms of corporal punishment at home and schools, conduct human rights campaigns on the prevention of child abuse and adopt child-sensitive procedures in child-related criminal procedures. The relevant laws need to be amended to ensure the implementation of the Student Rights Ordinances, one of the goals of which is to ban corporal punishment and guarantee the freedom of expression and assembly of students.

9. Civilian landmine victims: It is estimated that over 1,000 civilians have been killed or injured by landmine accidents since the outbreak of the Korean War in 1950. Up until today, people still fall victim to landmines every year. Unfortunately, no official statistics or investigation has been made regarding this matter. The cases of the landmine victims should be investigated and the legislation, which covers the victims’ living expenses, the costs of medical care, and compensation, should be enacted.

10. Compensation and diplomatic effort regarding the Japanese Military Sexual Slavery: From 1932 to the end of the Second World War, the Japanese government mobilized around 200,000 Asian women and forced them to serve as sexual slaves for the Japanese military. However, the Japanese government has been refusing to give an official apology and pay compensation for their past atrocities. The ROK Government has not put much diplomatic effort into resolving this issue either, and recently, the Constitutional Court of the ROK ruled that such lack of effort by the Government is unconstitutional. Nevertheless, the Government is still not putting any diplomatic pressure on the Japanese government to fulfil their legal responsibilities, despite the fact that many elderly survivors of Japanese Military Sexual Slavery have already passed away and the surviving women may soon pass away. Moreover, the Government has not yet specified the dispute resolution procedures, abstractly provided in the Korea-Japan treaty. The Government should make a clear request to the Japanese government for proper legal compensation to the victims of Japanese Military Sexual Slaves and make a settlement on the dispute resolution procedure promptly.

C. Administration of justice and the rule of law

11. Human rights training for military personnel (Recommendation No.11): The amount of human rights training provided to military personnel is entirely insufficient , and on the rare occasions that training does take place, it is often led by commanding officers, rather than by human right training specialists. The Government should provide effective human rights training to all military personnel in accordance with the World Programme for Human Rights Education.

12. Prohibition of torture (Recommendation No. 6, 10, 11, 12): Currently, domestic law lacks measures that define torture in line with Article 1 of the Convention Against Torture (CAT) or provide punishment for all acts of torture. It merely criminalizes “acts of violence or cruel treatment” and “unlawful arrest or detention in circumstances of abuse of authority” in its Criminal Code. As a result, instances of violence and cruel treatment perpetrated by the police or the prosecutor’s office continue to take place. The Government should adopt a comprehensive definition of torture as defined in the CAT and regularly undertake investigations to prevent torture and cruel, degrading and inhumane treatment, while providing human rights training to law enforcement officers.

13. Prohibition of arbitrary detention in the military (Recommendation No. 22, 26): Since the military court operates under the Ministry of Defence and not the Supreme Court of Justice, military personnel and civilian workers in the military are not guaranteed their right to fair trial. The military court adjudicators, who are appointed by the Minister of Defence, are military officers and not legal professionals. But they hold authority to influence military court decisions, which infringes the independence of the military court. Furthermore, according to the Military Personnel Management Act, a military officer who is not a judge may detain one’s subordinates in a military prison for maximum 15 days. The Government should abolish the military court during peacetime and require that lawsuits involving military personnel and civilian workers in the military take place in regular civilian courts. The Government should also revise the Military Personnel Management Act to require a warrant issued by a judge for a detention.

14. Abolition of the measure requiring sexual crimes to be investigated only upon complaint from victims (Recommendation No. 19): Under the current legal system, sexual crimes whose victims are non-disabled adults may only be investigated upon complaint from the victims. As a result, victims of sexual crimes are often subject to threats and other forms of pressure from perpetrators to waive or drop the charges or negotiate a settlement instead. Moreover, when victims were filing complaints or being investigated, law enforcement officers even encourage them to make a settlement, which puts them under extra pressure to give up the charges. The pending Revised Criminal Code also fails to abolish the relevant measure. The Government should establish a concrete and systematic plan to abolish such requirement for all sexual crimes.

D. Right to privacy, marriage and family life

15. Punishment of marital rape and domestic violence (Recommendation No. 14, 32): In 2010, marital rape accounted for 10.4% of sexual abuse cases. Although rape crime exists under the Article 297 of the Criminal Code, according to which female spouses can also be victims of rape crime, the punishment of such crime is not easily realized in the practice of the judicial procedure. The Government should amend the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Punishment, etc. of Crimes of Domestic Violence in order to better protect marital rape victims and punish the offenders.

16. Reconsideration on the resident registration system and the limitations of the use of registration numbers outside the public sector (Recommendation No. 13): The Government is still maintaining the resident registration system which involves taking fingerprints from the holders. The Government is even planning to introduce a chip equipped electronic resident registration card system, which may contain a lot of personal information. In February 2012, the Government amended the Act that limits the collection of residential number on the Internet. However, the Internet Personal Identification Number (I-Pin), an alternative system to resident registration number for personal identification online, still requires a residential number, and there is no restriction on collecting residential numbers outside the Internet. The Government should reconsider the resident registration system itself, including the electronic resident registration card system, and abolish the legislation that directly and indirectly requires the residential number before accessing an online service, so that private enterprises’ collection, storage, and the use of residential numbers can be strictly regulated or prohibited.
17. Collection of DNA information: The legislation which enables the collection of suspect’s DNA, who is under arrest for at least 1 of 11 crimes including child sexual violence, murder, and rape, is now in force and it has provisions that allow extensive search and report of collected DNA . The use of collected DNA should be strictly limited and the relevant legislation should be made.

18. Information leak of victims residing in shelters: Personal information of victims of sexual violence, domestic violence, and sex trafficking that reside in shelters is collected and piled in an online social welfare information system. The information is stored for 5 years after the victims leave the shelters. The Government is not complying with the personal information protection principle, which is the most basic principle in supporting violence victims, by compelling the use of the social welfare information system whose security has not been approved. Since the current online management number contains the facility number, it is possible for the victims to be put under other dangerous situations for their whereabouts are easily exposable with these numbers. The Government should amend the Social Service Act that requires the upload personal information of victims of sexual violence, domestic violence and sex trafficking on the Internet. Also, the Government should legislate a special law to ensure the needs of female victims of violence are taken into consideration.

E. Freedom of religion or belief, expression, association and peaceful assembly and right to participate in public and political life

19. Conscientious objectors (Recommendation No. 17, 24): The UN recommended to the ROK Government several times to provide alternatives to military service, and the Government has repeatedly insisted that it is working on such measures – but without any visible progress. In fact, the Government has only just conducted surveys on the issue without raising awareness on alternative military service. Only because the survey results show that a number of people refuse to adopt alternative military service, the Government has said that it has no intention to introduce alternative military service. In 2011, revising the Military Service Law regarding conscientious objectors had been proposed at the National Assembly but there has been no discussion since then, and it was abrogated due to the expiration of term. It is not fair to delay promoting and protecting human rights only because the majority does not agree. The Government should immediately introduce alternative military service that complies with international standards and take steps to raise awareness on this issue.

20. Freedom of association and peaceful assembly (Recommendation No. 9): In 2009, the Constitutional Court ruled night time assembly constitutional but night time demonstration is still prohibited. In principle, the Assembly and Demonstration Act stipulates that assemblies and demonstrations only need to be reported but in practice, it is being used as a de facto permit system and the police can make arbitrary decisions on granting assemblies and demonstrations. Also, members of the police who use violence against demonstrators are not being properly punished. The Government should revise the Assembly and Demonstration Act to guarantee freedom of association and peaceful assembly. In addition, the Government should forbid existing practice of permitting assemblies beforehand and ensure the conduct of police forces is in accordance with the international human rights standards, as well as investigate and punish law enforcement officers who overuse their force.

21. Freedom of expression of civil servants: Under the present administration, the freedom of political expression of civil servants has been severely restricted. In 2009, the Government took disciplinary action and brought criminal charges against the Korean Teachers and Educational Workers Union which expressed its opinion on political issues. In the same year, the Government also harassed the Korean Government Employees’ Union, the Korean Democratic Government Employees’ Union, and the Court Government Employees’ Union when they expressed its views on political issues, made an advertisement critical to the Government, and participated in assemblies sponsored by the opposition party. Freedom of expression of civil servants is guaranteed by the Constitution , and the Joint ILO and UNESCO Recommendation by the Committee of Experts on the Application of Recommendations Concerning Teaching Personnel. Freedom of expression of civil servants should not be restricted due to public sector employee’s responsibility to remain politically neutral. The Government should immediately amend related legislations including the National Public Service Law, the Political Fund Law, the Political Party Law, and the Teacher’s Union Law that include articles which ban political activities of civil servants.

22. Right to participate in political and public life: On 27 February 2012, the Public Official Election Act was amended ‘to allow election campaigns on the Internet and social networking service at all times (except the election day)’. However, penalty clause on slandering other candidates still remains and can be arbitrarily abused. The Article 93, clause 1 of the Public Official Election Act should be abolished and regulations on offline election campaigns should be eased. In addition, punishing the slandering other candidates under the election law should be abolished since there is no clear definition between slandering and justifiable criticism.

23. Freedom of expression on the Internet: The Korea Communications Standards Commission (KCSC) determines what information on the Internet is illegal, harmful to minors, and unsound and then takes measures to delete or correct it. Almost all the information that was screened by the KCSC is being deleted from the Internet. The KCSC, however, is not an independent administrative organization and is screening the information without clear standards and takes measures to delete content before a judicial body makes decisions. This gravely violates the freedom of expression on the Internet. The KCSC should not have authorities to screen online content.

24. National Security Act (Recommendation No. 4, 24, 33): Since 2008, the number of people who were persecuted for violating the National Security Act has greatly increased. However, the rate of the prosecution rate is much lower than that of being charged for violating the Act, which indicates that the National Security Act is being abused. The Government should launch domestic campaigns to promote the abolishment of the National Security Act, implement human rights trainings on law enforcement officers, and abolish the National Security Act.

F. Right to work and to just and favourable conditions of work and right to protection from corporate human rights abuse

25. Social security for non-regular employees: Although existing laws stipulate that non-regular employees should join social insurance mandatorily, low wage and unstable nature of non-regular employment make it difficult for them to bear the cost associated with joining a social insurance. In 2011, only 32.2% of non-regular employees were participating in the national pension (employer-provided), 37.3% in the national health insurance (employer-provided), and 35.8% in the unemployment insurance, all of which are substantially lower than the participation rates of regular employees. In a social security system based on social insurance, such a lack of access to social insurance for non-regular employees implies that the group is exposed to various risks associated with health problems, unemployment, and aging. The Government should subsidize the social insurance fees for low-wage, non-regular employees to increase their social insurance participation and should expand the scope of social services universally applied to all employees, regardless of their payment of social insurance fees.

26. Occupational injury insurance: Under the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act, an employee who suffered damage from accident relating to the work must establish the medical causal relationship between the accident or damage and the work in order to receive compensation. However, in case of occupational illnesses, it is virtually impossible for an employee, who is not a medical expert, to prove the causality. Since the standard is very difficult to meet, only 52.1% of workplace illnesses are recognized as consequences of industrial accidents, eligible for compensation. The Government should revise the relevant laws to require the insurer, not the employee, to establish the medical causal relationship between the work and the accident or damage.

27. Need for National Contact Point reform: The National Contact Point (NCP), operated under the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises, has failed to prevent or remedy human rights violations perpetrated by Korean corporations operating abroad. In the ROK, the Working Group on the Foreign Investment has functioned as the NCP. However, the Working Group primarily consists of high-level government officials while civil society organizations are excluded. Since the establishment of the NCP, recommendations have been given only once and there has even been a case in which no action was taken for three years after a complaint was filed. The Government should establish a neutral and independent NCP in which civil society can participate and should regulate the NCP in accordance with the revised OECD Guidelines, such as stipulating a deadline for acting on each complaint that is filed.

G. Right to social security and to adequate standard of living

28. The welfare system in the ROK has improved and established a basic frame of social security services. However, it remains selective, since welfare benefits aimed at marginalized groups include low-income households, rather than a universal welfare benefits for every member of the society. The social welfare budget of the Government is only 7.5% of the GDP, which is at an unsatisfactory level compared to the OECD countries’ average (20.6%). Because of the current economic crisis, including the increase of non-regular workers, the working poor has increased and social and economic inequality has worsened. The Government should strengthen efforts to provide proper wages to all workers and regularise non-regular jobs. Also, the Government should expand the social security budget up to 15% of the GDP, secure support for the elderly, disabled persons and children, and expand public services on education, medical, and housing system.

29. Public assistance: The number of National Basic Livelihood security system recipients has stayed at 3% of the total population in the last 10 years, while the number of the poor has increased. The reason is that more than a million people who are in need of benefits are not entitled to receive public assistance due to strict qualification standards. Also, their wages do not even reach minimum standards of living. The strict standards for the recipients should be moderated and the Government should increase the minimum wage to a level of at least more than 40% of incomes earned by workers in urban areas.

30. National Health Insurance: In 2008, the National Health Insurance coverage is only 62.2 % which is lower than other OECD countries’ average (90%). The National Health Insurance should include all medical expenses, and there should be a limit on medical expense that individuals need to pay to ease one’s burden. Also, public hospitals should be more than 30% of total hospitals.

31. National pension scheme (social security for the elderly): About 45% of the aging population suffers from poverty, which is three times more than the OECD countries’ average (13%) and the suicide rate among the aging population is one of the highest in the world which is 78 out of one hundred thousand people. If one joins the national pension scheme for 40 years, he/she can receive 40% of their average income. However, non-regular workers who are reluctant to join social insurance are expected to receive only 15~16% of their wage. The basic old-age pension was introduced in owing to secure the wage of the elderly who are excluded from the national pension scheme, but it is not enough to provide enough security since the qualification for the pension is restrictive and the amount of the pension is low. The Government should provide measures to cover more applicants and extend the period in which the national pension scheme can apply. Moreover, the basic old-age pension should increase from 5% to 10% of their average wage in the national pension scheme and include all the elderly who are over 65 years old.

32. Unemployment insurance (expansion of employment security net): Unemployment insurance was designed for all paid workers, but according to the Korean Statistical Information Service, the insured persons are only 58.9% of all paid workers. Even the insured persons who are unemployed have difficulties in being beneficiaries of the unemployment insurance because criteria are very strict. Only 11% can get unemployment benefit among those who lose their jobs. Furthermore, unemployed young people and small shopkeepers who closed down their shops are excluded from the insurance benefits because they were not paid workers. The Government should take measures to ease criteria to expand the range of recipients and to extend the period of benefits. Also, the jobseeker’s allowance should be guaranteed to unemployed young people and unemployed small shopkeepers who seek for a job and to participate in a vocational training.

33. Right to education and to participate in the cultural life of the community: University tuition fees in the ROK are placed the second highest in the world (5,315PPP), only ‘bettered’ by the United States (6,312PPP). Korean students and their parents spend around 30~40% of annual income for the university tuition fees. 72.3% of candidates for graduation are in debt and 84% of the debt is for their tuition fees. More than 30,000 students have bad credit because they cannot pay back their student loan. Even though tuition fees are unaffordable, the college entrance rate is the highest in the world (83%) because the wage gap depending on educational background is very high. The higher educational budget is only 0.6% of total the GDP, which is half of the OECD countries’ average (1.1%). To ease the burden of students and their parents to the level of the OECD countries’ average (10% of annual income), the Government should expand the higher educational budget to the level of OECD countries’ average and increase the number of public universities.

H. Migrant, refugees and asylum-seekers

34. Rights of migrant women and measures against human trafficking and sex trafficking (Recommendation No. 8, 15, 21, 32): When a foreign woman immigrates to the ROK for international marriage, her legal status is dependent upon the Korean spouse’s certification of her identity. The spouse reference system has reinforced the inequality that exists between the Korean husband and migrant wife. Also, many migrant women are being recruited into Korea’s sex industry through fraud, coercion and various other means, yet very few traffickers are prosecuted or punished. In particular, the migrant women who enter the ROK on the E-6 “Entertainment Visa” are sent to bars and clubs that are frequented by foreigners and are subjected to prostitution or other forms of sexual exploitation by pimps. The existing law and the proposed revision of the Criminal Code are insufficient for regulating the practice of human trafficking in reality, and they pardon the act from constituting human trafficking as long as the “consent” of the human trafficking victim exists. Therefore, with regard to the pending Revised Criminal Code, the Government should enact a comprehensive definition of human trafficking in line with the Protocol to Prevent, Suppress and Punish Trafficking in Persons. Also, the Government should prioritize protecting trafficking victims during the investigation or trial process and the privacy of the trafficking victim should be protected through legal means. The victims should be provided legal status which should stay effective even after the completion of the litigation, in order to prevent the repatriation of the victims to their countries of origin where they could face retaliation and other dangers. Also, the Government should at least provide the minimum welfare benefits and medical care to the trafficking victims as well as the right to work. In order to address a more fundamental problem, the role and structure of the E-6 visa should be subjected to scrutiny, and E-6 broker agencies should be monitored and regulated more rigorously. Furthermore, the Government should abolish the spouse reference system, establish effective social safety nets for migrant women who are victims of sex trafficking, domestic violence and sexual violence and provide them legal status of residence and access to social services.

35. Birth registration of migrant children: Since there is no birth registration system in place for children of foreign nationality in the ROK, the children of undocumented migrant workers and refugees cannot be registered. The Government should revise relevant laws to enable the birth registration of all children regardless of their parents’ nationality, status of residence, and other legal or social status.

36. Children of undocumented migrants (Recommendation No. 7, 15): Access to medical services of undocumented migrant children in Korea, estimated to be about 17,000, is only partially protected. They can be supported regarding inpatient care and outpatient surgical care but cannot be supported regarding general office visits, vaccinations, or routine medical examinations. Moreover, undocumented migrant children can only access such services at 77 medical facilities nationwide. Furthermore, the Immigration Control Act, which regulates crackdowns, detentions and deportations of undocumented migrants, does not differentiate between adults and children, or contain child-sensitive measures for humanitarian purposes. The Government should enact the Migrant Children Rights Protection Act which was suggested in 2010. It should also revise the Immigration Control Act to ensure that the children who are found out to be undocumented migrants and are ordered to be deported are permitted to complete their education for the semester or the school year, in order to protect the children’s right to primary and secondary education.

37. Refugees and asylum-seekers (Recommendation No. 30): Since the Ministry of Justice and the Korean courts often reject asylum applications based on the grounds irrelevant to the definition of refugee according to the 1951 Refugee Convention, Korea’s refugee recognition rate has been substantially low. The newly passed Refugee Act, which is set to be enforced from beginning of July 2013, still retains many problems from the refugee related provisions in the Immigration Control Act. In addition, asylum-seekers often lack access to information and support regarding applying for asylum. The Government should provide adequate mandatory training for immigration officers and law enforcement officers in order to ensure that they properly identify asylum-seekers. Refugee application documents should also be available in languages other than Korean and English. Finally, the Government should provide basic living support or grant the right to work to asylum-seekers.

38. Detention of migrants: Since the Immigration Control Act does not limit the duration of detention, the indefinite detention of asylum-seekers and refugees is possible even without periodic judicial review. Even minors are subject to prolonged detention without adequate protection and support for child welfare. Persons deemed “inadmissible” to the ROK territory, some of whom are asylum-seekers, are detained in transit zones for an unspecified, unforeseeable length of time under inhuman conditions. The Government should end arbitrary, prolonged immigration detention, especially for asylum-seekers and refugees. The immigrants in detention should be provided with adequate access to information on the asylum application procedures, and alternatives to detention for asylum applicants should be established. The basic living conditions in transit zones should be improved to meet humanitarian standards, and access to legal and social assistance should be made available.

39. Stateless persons: The Government should institute effective and accessible procedures that identify stateless person in order to fulfil its obligations under the Convention relating to the Status of Stateless Persons.

I. Women and Children

40. Birth registration and protection of adopted children: In the ROK, the number of actual domestic adoptions is always higher than the official figure. “Secret” adoptions, which cause the discrepancy, are made possible by ROK’s inadequate birth registration system, which takes place at the local administrative office, and not at the hospital. In a secret adoption, the child is registered as the biological child of the adopting parents, instead of as an adopted child born to an unwed mother. As a result, the adoption is not recorded, leaving open the possibility of child-selling. The Government should ensure and verify that the birth registration accurately indicates the biological parents of the child by modifying the existing system to require a birth certificate issued by the hospital or the attending physician or midwife. Also, the Government should work in partnership with civil society, especially in deciding how the Korea Central Adoption Resources Agency (KCARE) should be organized and operated.

41. Support for unwed mothers: Each year, about 90% of international adoptees and 85% of domestic adoptees are born of unwed mothers . Unwed mothers are often forced to relinquish their children due to social stigma and financial difficulties resulting from the prejudice. The Government should provide adequate support to unwed mothers so that the support is socially and financially incentivized as the best form of childcare. Both the Single-Parent Family Welfare Act and the National Basic Livelihood Security Act should be amended in a way to provide universal single-parent benefits to unmarried mothers such as a basic living subsidy for all unmarried mothers until the child reaches a certain age, regardless of the mother’s employment status or wage level and whether or not the unmarried mother has a person with a legal duty to support her.

42. Rights of women workers: The difference in the proportion of non-regular employees between women and men has gradually been increasing. Moreover, the wage discrepancy between women and men by types of employment is also widening. Women are generally concentrated in low-wage, poorly-conditioned jobs in small-to-mid-sized workplaces. The employment rate of women in general is also very low, and the maternity leave system for giving birth or caring for children is also very under-used. On a related note, few men take advantage of the parental leave system. The Government should address the gender discrepancy problem of wage and increase the proportion of regular employment for women in the labour force. Also, the Labour Standards Act should be revised to eliminate the measure which excludes a worker who is hired for domestic works from the definition of employee. The Government should take active steps to protect women’s right to work during pregnancy and child-rearing periods and encourage men to take up parental leave.

STATEMENT

We strongly condemn the ROK government’s deportation measure on Benjamain Monnet and Angie Zelter.

Benjamain Monnet, a peace activist, who had been protesting the construction of a naval base in Gangjeong village on Jeju Island, was deported at 7:30 pm on 15 March 2012, through Incheon International Airport. Angie Zelter was also asked to leave the country on 22 March 2012. Such action clearly demonstrates the government’s unwillingness to listen to the opposing voice against the construction of the naval base, and the incapability of the government to ensure the stay of international peace-seeking activists.

The Immigration Office issued the compulsory eviction order within just a few minutes after the investigation on Monnet was done. Accordingly, we carried out every possible due process of law, filing the revocation litigation against the compulsory eviction order, and requesting the suspension of execution. However, the Immigration Office ignored such efforts and executed the eviction order within less than 24 hours. It is clear that the government had already decided to deport Monnet hence the investigation was just spin.
The Immigration Office did not notify the lawyer, even though they were fully aware of the fact that Monnet planned to hire a lawyer and file the revocation litigation against the compulsory eviction order. Monnet did not even get a chance to make a phone call when he was deported. Furthermore, when the lawyer requested the Immigration Office to give them a copy of the compulsory eviction order and the protection order, the office did not make a prompt action, making a bunch of excuses before issuing them almost an hour later. While the deportation measure was preceded with quite a swift action, the effort to ensure legal procedure to fight against illegality and unjustness was proceeded slowly enough to seem deliberate.
In the course of his transfer from Jeju to Hwasung, Monnet asked to change clothes, but the Immigration Office rejected it saying, “You can change in the car.” The very basic request for human dignity was ignored.
The deportation order made on Angie Zelter shares the same issue. She was ordered to leave the country by March 22, 2012. If she does not leave the country voluntarily by the due date, the compulsory eviction order will be put into practice. The government is not capable of handling the Nobel Peace prize nominee’s activity.

It is fairly anomalous that the execution of the deportation order was done within less than 24 hours after the order was issued.

We, Minbyun-Lawyers for a Democratic Society, are seriously concerned about the administrative measures of the ROK government against both of the international peace activists, Benjamain Monnet and Angie Zelter, who are against the destruction of Gureombi. The ROK government is internationally disgracing itself by violating one’s human rights. We thus will initiate international legal proceedings by reporting this to the UN Special Rapporteur on Human Rights Defenders and requesting an appropriate intervention. In addition, we will strongly condemn the government’s unlawful measure in solidarity with Human Rights organizations abroad.

March 16, 2012

Minbyun-Lawyers for a Democratic Society
Chairman Sun-soo, Kim

A/HRC/WG.6/2/KOR/3

25 March 2008

Summary Prepared by the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, in accordance with Paragragh 15 (C) of the annex to Human Rights Council Resolution 5/1

Republic of Korea

I. BACKGROUND AND FRAMEWORK
A. Scope of international obligations
1. In a joint submission, Lawyers for a Democratic Society, People’s Solidarity for
Participatory Democracy, Korean Women’s Association United and Korean Progressive
Network Jinbonet in association with other non-governmental organizations (MINBYUNPSPD-
KWAU-KPNJ and other NGOs) noted that the Government has not defined its position
on withdrawing its reservations on a number of provisions of the core human rights treaties.
Moreover, the State party did not ratify the Optional Protocol to the Convention against
Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (OP-CAT) as well
as the International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and
Members of Their Families (ICRMW).

 

B. Constitutional and legislative framework
2. The National Human Rights Commission of Korea (NHRCK) indicated that under the
Constitution, the international human rights instruments acceded and ratified by the
Government have the same legal effect as the domestic legislation. However, according to the
NHRCK, international human rights law is still not widely known to the public, and the
Executive, Legislative and Judicial branches do not possess an in-depth understanding of their
legal obligations to implement international human rights law. Recently, the Judicial and the
Legislative branches have begun to refer to international human rights law.2 NHRCK
recommended developing national mechanisms for the Legislative and Judicial branches to
participate in the implementation of international instruments and to find effective ways to
disseminate these instruments.3
3. MINBYUN-PSPD-KWAU-KPNJ and other NGOs pointed out that only “citizens”
(rather than “non-citizens”) are protected by the Constitution. It also differentiates civil rights
from social rights where the state has wide discretion and denies the indivisibility of these two
rights. While the Constitution states that international law shall have “the same effect as
domestic law”, the binding power of international human rights law has been denied in
reality, according to MINBYUN-PSPD-KWAU-KPNJ and other NGOs.4
 

C. Institutional and human rights infrastructure
4. The NHRCK was established in 2001, after a three year consultation period with a
wide range of sectors and actors in Korean society, as indicated by the Asian Legal Resource
Centre (ALRC).5 It is accredited with ‘A status’ vis-à-vis the International Coordinating
Committee of national human rights institutions.6 MINBYUN-PSPD-KWAU-KPNJ and other
NGOs noted that the NHRCK has made recommendations on major policies, laws and
ordinances and contributed to human rights improvements in detention facilities among
others. However, according to MINBYUN-PSPD-KWAU-KPNJ and other NGOs, the
NHRCK has been passive in addressing violations in relation to economic, social and cultural
rights. Moreover, the Government has minimized, distorted or disregarded the
recommendations rendered by the Commission, thus hindering overall improvement in human
rights situation. 7
5. In a joint submission, the Korean Women’s Association United, the Korea Women’s
Hotline, the Women Migrant Human Rights Centre in Korea, the Korea Sexual Violence
Relief Centre, the Differently Abled Women United and other non-governmental
organizations (KWAU-KWH-WMHRCK-DAWU and other NGOs) reported that a proposal
for the reorganization of government bodies was submitted to the National Assembly in
January 2008. The new administration wants to combine the Ministry of Gender Equality &
Family and the Ministry of Health & Welfare and to reduce the ministry responsible for
gender affairs to a toothless committee within another ministry, which is a huge setback for
Korean women’s human rights. The Ministry of Gender Equality was first established in 2001
and expanded the scope of its responsibility by taking over childcare matters in 2004, and
family policies in 2005.8
 

D. Policy measures
6. The NHRCK informed that in May 2007, the Government set up the National Action
Plan for the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights (NAP). NHRCK noted however that
the NAP failed to address important issues regarding civil and political rights (such as the
recognition of political activities of civil servants and teachers, establishment of an
independent Military Prosecutor’s Office, abolishment of the National Security Act (NSA),
recognition of conscientious objection to military service, abolishment of the death penalty);
economic, social and cultural rights (improvements to industrial accident and unemployment
insurance policies, increase of the minimum legal wages, protection of the rights of patients,
prohibition of forced evictions without providing shelter, ratification of ILO Conventions on
the right to assembly); and other issues regarding socially marginalized people and minority
groups.9 MINBYUN-PSPD-KWAU-KPNJ and other NGOs also pointed out that the NAP has
not shown a clear stance on pressing human rights issues such as the National Security Act,
the death penalty and the rights of conscientious objectors to military service. The NAP also
neglects the cause of human rights protection for vulnerable people such as sexual minorities. 10
7. NHRCK recommended the Government to provide human rights education to law
enforcement officials including judges, prosecutors, public officials and social welfare
workers; to include and strengthen human rights education programs at all levels in a
comprehensive way and; to pass laws on human rights education.11

II. PROMOTION AND PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS ON THE GROUND
A. Cooperation with human rights mechanisms
8. MINBYUN-PSPD-KWAU-KPNJ and other NGOs indicated that the Government has
neglected its obligation to implement and disseminate the concluding observations of treaty
monitoring bodies and made no sincere efforts to cooperate with civil society.12
 

B. Implementation of international human rights obligations1. Equality and non discrimination
9. The NHRCK noted that CEDAW has largely contributed to improvements of
women’s rights in the Republic of Korea. It influenced the process of revising the family law,
which led to the most important achievement in the four years, namely the abolishment of the
male-only family head system or hojuje. Still, according to the NHRCK, there remain many
problems: a wide salary gap between men and women, the low ratio of women in high
ranking positions, violence against women, sexual harassment and stereotypes on gender roles
including the conception that women should be the primary child caregivers. The NHRCK
recommended to proactively implement policies to change stereotypes of women and
intensify the punishment of perpetrators of violence against women.13 MINBYUN-PSPDA/
KWAU-KPNJ and other NGOs noted that despite the abolishment of the “family head
system”, women are still experiencing political, economic, social and cultural discrimination
and some of the Government’s gender equality policies have been repealed contributing to a
lower awareness of women’s human rights in Korean society. 14
10. The International Gay and Lesbian Human Rights Commission (IGLHRC) informed
that South Korea’s policies on Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and Queer (LGBTQ)
issues have been relatively progressive. The country prohibited employment discrimination
based on sexual orientation in 2001, and permitted people who had undergone gender
reassignment surgery to get personal documents reflecting their changed gender identity in
2006. But homophobia persists and LGBTQ activists continue to fight discrimination in
schools and in the military, as reported by IGLHRC. Many gay websites remain censored.15
IGLHRC also informed that in 2007, the Ministry of Justice drafted an anti-discrimination bill.
However, IGLHRC indicated that the bill, which was at that time pending in the Legislative
and Judiciary Committee, excluded seven protected categories, including sexual orientation. 16
11. Recently, rights of persons with disabilities have become a major social concern, as
highlighted by the NHRCK. The Government introduced improved policies and enacted
legislation, the Act on Discrimination against Persons with Disabilities in 2007. The NHRCK
also informed that the Government signed the Convention on the Rights of Persons with
Disabilities but has not yet ratified it.17 KWAU-KWH-WMHRCK-DAWU and other NGOs
indicated however, that policies and programs for persons with disabilities are gender-blind,
highlighting the importance of considering the unique needs of women. 18 MINBYUN-PSPDKWAU-
KPNJ and other NGOs also noted that although a bill regarding anti-discrimination
against persons with disabilities has been enacted, employment and income discrimination
regarding persons with disabilities still exists. The law ensuring the right to move for persons
with disabilities does not guarantee the right to access to roads and buildings and public
transportation. Furthermore, persons with disabilities are often institutionalized without their
consent, deprived of their personal relationships and cultural rights, and suffer from poor
housing, food conditions, forced labour and violent abuse within the facilities. According to
MINBYUN-PSPD-KWAU-KPNJ and other NGOs, the Act should include the prohibition of
discrimination based on the forms of employment, and the Government should endeavour to
continuously monitor private sector as well as public sector to stop discrimination against
persons with disabilities. An organization regulating and supervising the welfare facilities
should be created and policies encouraging the self-reliance of persons with disabilities
should be promoted.19

2. Right to life, liberty and security of the person
12. AI noted that 30 December 2007 marked the ten year anniversary since the
Government of the Republic of Korea last carried out any executions and therefore AI
considers the Republic of Korea ”abolitionist in practice”. AI reported that on 31 December
2007 the President commuted six death row prison inmates’ sentences to life imprisonment.
However, 58 prisoners remain on death row and certain crimes still carry the death penalty.
In 2007, two death sentences were passed. AI indicated that the Special Bill to Abolish the
Death Penalty has been before the Legislation and Judiciary Committee of the National
Assembly since 2005, and if not voted on before the end of the current parliamentary session,
the Special Bill will lapse in March 2008.20 AI recommended the Government to introduce a
formal moratorium as a step toward abolition of capital punishment and expedite passage into
law of the Special Bill to Abolish the Death Penalty in the National Assembly.21 The NHRCK
as well as MINBYUN-PSPD-KWAU-KPNJ and other NGOs also recommended abolishing
the death penalty.22
13. MINBYUN-PSPD-KWAU-KPNJ and other NGOs reported that women’s right to
health and their right to choose have also been violated because of illegal abortion practices.23
14. The NHRCK reported that torture against persons in detention by investigative
agencies and other national bodies, including prisons, has remarkably decreased over the past
four years. However, it also indicated that human rights violations in particular in unregistered
facilities are reported to be serious; therefore effective supervisory measures are needed. 24
NHRCK also noted that human rights in protective facilities for the mentally-ill, the disabled,
the older and children need to be urgently improved.25
15. On the issue of domestic violence, KWAU-KWH-WMHRCK-DAWU and other
NGOs reported that victims of domestic violence are not fully protected in the Republic of
Korea. This is because violence at home is culturally a matter of privacy; legal and
institutional safeguards for the victims are poor; the awareness is low in the police; the
aggressor is often allowed to stay at home while the victim is driven away under the existing
legal system; and public services focus on counselling for the victims rather than punishment
of the perpetrators, resulting in only 14.9% of prosecution among the arrested for domestic
violence in 2003. KWAU-KWH-WMHRCK-DAWU and other NGOs indicated that relevant
authorities must put more efforts on a campaign to raise awareness that domestic violence is a
crime; on appropriate injunction based on judging the danger the harmer puts on the victim;
and on guaranteeing the security of the victim. 26
16. The NHRCK reported that there is a growing recognition of the importance of the
rights of children, yet corporal punishment against children is still a particularly serious issue.
27 MINBYUN-PSPD-KWAU-KPNJ and other NGOs also reported that corporal punishment
is still prevalent in schools. 28 The Global Initiative to End All Corporal Punishment of
Children (GIEACPC) pointed out that corporal punishment is lawful at home. Children have
limited protection from violence under the Child Welfare Act, the Penal Code, the Special Act
on Punishment of Domestic Violence, the Act on Prevention of Domestic Violence and
Victim Protection, and the Constitution. 29 Corporal punishment is lawful in schools under
article 18(1) of the Act on Primary and Secondary Education and article 31(7) of the
Enforcement Decree of the Act. 30 GIEACPC further indicated that corporal punishment is
unlawful as a sentence for crime and as a disciplinary measure in penal institutions. There is
no explicit prohibition of corporal punishment in alternative care settings. GIEACPC strongly
recommended introducing legislation as a matter of urgency to prohibit corporal punishment
of children in all settings. 31
17. According to MINBYUN-PSPD-KWAU-KPNJ and other NGOs, arbitrary detention
is prevalent in the military because a considerable number of military personnel have been
detained only by the order of their superiors without due process or judicial procedure, while
unconvicted prisoners are incarcerated in “substitute cells” (detention cells in the military) for
significant periods of time.32

3. Administration of justice and the rule of law
18. MINBYUN-PSPD-KWAU-KPNJ and other NGOs pointed out that with the revision
of the Criminal Procedure Act and the enactment of the Habeas Corpus Act, the rights of
detainees have been emphasized. However the Criminal Procedure Act reinforces the powers
of the police and the prosecutorial offices and the Habeas Corpus Act is not completely
effective due to the fact that it explicitly excludes non-citizens in immigration detention
facilities and fails to provide enough concrete means to ensure habeas corpus protections. 33
19. Although the efforts of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission and other
institutions for transitional justice brought to light some past crimes, the wrongdoers’ refusal
to admit such crimes and the lack of punitive measures against them has rendered justice
ineffective, according to MINBYUN-PSPD-KWAU-KPNJ and other NGOs.34

4. Right to privacy, marriage and family life
20. The NHRCK noted that with the development of information technology, there is a
growing risk of privacy invasion, from Closed Circuit Television (CCTV) surveillance and
eavesdropping, to abuse of personal database and bio-recognition technology.35 Similar
concerns were also raised by MINBYUN-PSPD-KWAU-KPNJ and other NGOs. 36 NHRCK
recommended that efforts be made to protect the rights to privacy from excessive collection
and misuse of personal data. 37
21. KWAU-KWH-WMHRCK-DAWU and other NGOs raised the problems of
discrimination against untraditional families, indicating that the Health Family Act seems to
emphasize “Family” in its English title, but the Korean equivalent connotes “Healthy Home”,
dividing “healthy homes” and “unhealthy homes”. The act suggests that a traditional family
with a couple of man and woman and their children is healthy while other family types are
not. In particular, Article 3 stipulates that a family can be formed only by marriage, blood
relationship and adoption. KWAU-KWH-WMHRCK-DAWU and other NGOs indicated that
the law must be revised, because it excludes cohabitation, foster family, unwed parenthood or
other non-traditional families.38
22. KWAU-KWH-WMHRCK-DAWU and other NGOs indicated that civil law needs to
be amended to guarantee women’s equal property rights during marriage and at its
dissolution. Among Korean couples, 76.2% register their homes in the husband’s name, and
when couples file a divorce, only 20 to 40% of the wives receive some assets.39

5. Freedom of religion or belief, expression, association and peaceful assembly, and
right to participate in public and political life
23. The NHRCK noted that alternative military service programs for conscientious
objectors started to be considered. 40 On the same issue, MINBYUN-PSPD-KWAU-KPNJ
raised concerns that conscientious objectors are still being sent to jail due to the fact that
conscientious objection is considered a felony. Conscientious objectors to army reserve
training are repeatedly punished and forced to pay fines.41 The NHRCK recommended that
the Government introduce policies for conscientious objectors in a prompt manner, as
recommended by UN human rights bodies.42
24. According to MINBYUN-PSPD-KWAU-KPNJ and other NGOs, although the
Constitution expressly forbids a license system for assembly, the Government is operating a
de facto license system through issuing prior disapprovals under the related law which
obligates people to report assemblies and demonstrations beforehand. By surrounding areas
designated for assemblies and demonstrations with police squad buses, the police prevent people in general from approaching the areas and stifle any sort of communication, effectively
nullifying the right to assembly and demonstration.43 On the same issue, the NHRCK reports
that assemblies related to political issues were banned in advance for fear of traffic disruption
and probable violence.44
25. AI indicated that the National Security Act (NSA), in force since 1948, has been used
throughout the years to imprison people for engaging in peaceful political activities and for
publishing and distributing material deemed to “benefit” the enemy. The law provides long
sentences or even the death penalty for “anti-state” and “espionage” activities, but these terms
are not clearly defined.45 In this regard, AI highlighted the concluding observations of the
Human Rights Committee, on the third periodic report by the Republic of Korea, in which the
Committee noted that the restrictions placed on freedom of expression do not meet the
requirements of the Covenant and urged the State party, as a matter of urgency, to ensure
compatibility with requirements under the Covenant. AI also noted that similar earlier
recommendations by the Committee to amend the NSA in order to bring it into line with
international standards regarding clarity of criminal law have not been followed up.46 AI
recommended the Government to take concrete steps to abolish the NSA, or otherwise amend
it to bring it into line with international standards regarding clarity of criminal law, and
freedom of expression and association.47 The NHRCK also reported that the NSA has not
been abolished. 48
26. MINBYUN-PSPD-KWAU-KPNJ and other NGOs also informed that the NSA
arbitrarily makes it a criminal act to simply possess books or express views and is in reality
expanding in scope because of new legislations which strengthen surveillance and control of
communication, etc. Furthermore, the internet, which is the most important and widely used
open forum for exchanging diverse views and shaping public opinion, has been regulated by
law to prohibit the free expression of political views during the national elections.49
27. KWAU-KWH-WMHRCK-DAWU and other NGOs noted the low level of women’s
participation in political activities, recalling that the national assembly had had fewer than 10
women lawmakers until the 17th election, which produced seats for 43 women.50

6. Right to work and to just and favourable conditions of work
28. MINBYUN-PSPD-KWAU-KPNJ and other NGOs noted that “irregular workers” face
steep challenges in Korean society; they lack a social safety net and suffer from a disparity
between irregular workers and regular workers regarding income and labor conditions.
Irregular workers make up nearly 50 percentof the Korean workers, contributing to the
deepening of social polarization.51 The NHRCK also reported that irregular workers are
seriously suffering from discrimination in employment. The NHRCK informed that after the
Act on Protection for Non-regular Workers became effective in July 2007, some employers
started to fire irregular workers or to deny renewal of their contracts to avoid the possibility of
regularizing them.52
29. KWAU-KWH-WMHRCK-DAWU and other NGOs informed that although more
women want to work, only 54.7 percent of women aged between 15 and 64 actually found a
job in 2006. According to a survey of Korea National Statistical Office in August 2006,
among those working women, 67.6 percent have non-regular jobs and suffer from low-paying
insecure employment.53 MINBYUN-PSPD-KWAU-KPNJ and other NGOs raised similar
concerns, recommending that relevant laws to protect women’s labour rights and prohibit
discrimination should be enacted or revised.54 KWAU-KWH-WMHRCK-DAWU and other
NGOs recommended that care workers and other unofficial workers be legally recognized as
workers.55
30. As reported by MINBYUN-PSPD-KWAU-KPNJ and other NGOs, because of their
part-time employee status, juveniles also suffer from poor labour conditions where they are
withheld pay or underpaid but work for long hours. However, they also lack legislative
protection from this situation.56
31. The International Trade Unions Confederation (ITUC) informed that the law on the
Establishment and Operation of Public Officials Trade Unions went into effect on 28 January
2006. Civil servants are allowed to legally organise within administrative units predefined by
the law. However, there are a numerous categories of public officials who are still denied
union rights, including managers, human resources personnel, personnel dealing with trade
unions or industrial relations, and special public servants such as military, police, fire-fighters,
politically-appointed officials, and high level public officials. Civil servants have the right to
collective bargaining, but the subjects of negotiation are limited to matters concerning trade
unions, members’ pay and welfare and other working conditions. Hence, trade unions cannot
address other economic and social issues. ITUC reported that restrictions on collective action
prompted in 2006, strong opposition to the law by the Government Employees Union
(KGEU) affiliated to the Korean Confederation of Trade Unions (KTCU), and also
Government action against the KGEU that included the closure of over a hundred local union
offices.57 MINBYUN-PSPD-KWAU-KPNJ and other NGOs also raised concerns regarding
the rights of workers to collective action and strike. 58
32. ITUC also informed that in November 2006, the government passed through the
Parliament a series of revised labour laws that will make it easier to hire replacement workers
during strikes, and employ workers on temporary contracts. According to ITUC, in 2006,
employers continued to fire trade unionists with impunity, and frequently filed criminal
charges (and demands for huge amounts of compensation) for alleged ‘obstruction of
business’ resulting from regular union activities. ITUC indicated that police violence against
strikers continued in 2006, resulting in serious injuries for some and the death of one steel
worker. 59

7. Right to social security and to an adequate standard of living
33. According to the NHRCK, the understanding that the Government should guarantee
and fulfil individuals’ economic, social and cultural rights needs to be strengthened. For the
past four years, governmental policies to guarantee social rights have improved. However,
considering a wider gap between the rich and the poor, increasing job insecurity, and
unemployment, individuals’ social rights need to be more protected, as noted by the
NHRCK.60 Combined with the lack of a social safety net and the weakness of the current
social welfare system, economic divide and expansion of the poor are becoming more serious,
contributing to the tendency of poverty passing on from generation to generation, as
highlighted by the NHRCK.61 KWAU-KWH-WMHRCK-DAWU and other NGOs also
raised concerns about the situation of families with single mothers who live below the poverty
line. 62 Similar concerns were also raised by the MINBYUN-PSPD-KWAU-KPNJ and other
NGOs recommending to readjust the criteria for selecting eligible recipients of the Basic
Livelihood Security and the Minimum Cost of Living and; to establish a universal basic
pension system to cover those excluded from the present National Pension Scheme. 63
34. The NHRCK noted that the public health insurance program is being provided to all
individuals, and that the range of coverage is improving. However, the portion that
individuals pay needs to be reduced and insurance coverage requires to be further widened,
partly because economic burdens on patients with incurable diseases and long-term care needs
are ever increasing.64The NHRCK recommended the Government to provide measures to
guarantee the right to health by strengthening the social welfare system, guaranteeing rights to
shelter, and expanding medical assistance for the poor so that all individuals in the country
can enjoy adequate standards of living.65
35. MINBYUN-PSPD-KWAU-KPNJ and other NGOs reported that forced evictions
without prior warning are still prevalent, even during winter months or in the middle of the
night. There is a lack of an effective housing policy covering unregistered dwellings and
tenants. 2,550,000 houses including “vinyl houses”, “single rooms in lodgings” and
“basement rooms” are below the housing minimum standard, as specified by the Korean laws
and ordinances. Furthermore, hundreds of farmers in Pyongtaek have lost their homestead
because of the recent move by a foreign army base to that area.66 MINBYUN-PSPD-KWAUKPNJ
and other NGOs indicated that the provisions facilitating forced evictions without prior
warning must be eliminated. Where there are either public projects or private construction
projects, the Government should make it mandatory to build rental houses or temporary
lodgings for those subject to forced evictions. They further recommended that affordable
housing be supplied and realistic criteria for eligible residents for public rental housing be
adopted.67
8. Right to education
36. MINBYUN-PSPD-KWAU-KPNJ and other NGOs indicated that compulsory primary
school education, although free in principle, is placing a significant financial burden on
families.68 As noted by NHRCK, middle school education is also compulsory, but parents still
need to pay for some portion of the education. Furthermore, according to MINBYUN-PSPDKWAU-
KPNJ and other NGOs, the continued emphasis on college entrance examinationcentred
policy is increasing the financial burden on families and is also causing a disparity in
the quality of education amongst Koreans belonging to different income tax brackets. 69
NCHRK recommended that measures be taken to guarantee the right to education for students
from low-income families.70 MINBYUN-PSPD-KWAU-KPNJ and other NGOs indicated that
the Government should adopt concrete measures to implement the recommendations of the
United Nations Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights which mention the
alleviation of the financial education burden on the lower income tax bracket families by the
normalization of public educational systems, reforms for the excessive college entrance
examination competition, and the promotion of equal accessibility regarding higher
education.71
37. MINBYUN-PSPD-KWAU-KPNJ and other NGOs informed that it is still very
difficult for persons with disabilities to receive a proper education. In order to realistically
promote education amongst persons with disabilities, the Bill for the Special Education of
Persons with Disabilities, which advocates the establishment of schools and classes with
specialized teachers, as well as free compulsory pre-school education for infants with
disabilities, should be supported with an adequate budget and personnel. MINBYUN-PSPDKWAU-
KPNJ and other NGOs also recommended expanding compulsory education for
women with disabilities.72 Similar recommendations were made by KWAU-KWHWMHRCK-
DAWU and other NGOs.73

9. Migrants, refugees and asylum seekers
38. The NHRCK stated that with the increase of migrants, the Government has developed
new policies and revised legislations in this area. However, according to the NHRCK,
discriminations that migrants are facing in their daily lives are serious. 74 AI indicated that as
far as they are aware, the Republic of Korea became the first labour-importing country in Asia
to seek to protect the rights of migrant workers when it introduced the Act concerning the
Employment Permit System for migrant workers (EPS Act) in August 2003. As of 2007, the
number of migrant workers was estimated at 502,082, of which at least 210,000 are irregular
migrant workers. 75 ITUC raised similar concerns and pointed out that migrant workers are
granted only a three years work permit, and are strictly forbidden from changing their
employer. 76 NHRCK recommended to enhance social awareness and, to revise legislation
and policies for better protection of the basic rights of migrants. 77
39. KWAU-KWH-WMHRCK-DAWU and other NGOs highlighted that women
constitute roughly one-third of all migrant workers and are particularly vulnerable to
exploitation, sexual harassment and violence. Lack of mandatory health insurance also affects
women migrant workers. Many women migrant workers who have experienced sexual
violence claim that they were threatened by their employer with forcible return to their home
country if they reported the incident 78 MINBYUN-PSPD-KWAU-KPNJ and other NGOs
made similar observations noting also that many migrant women who enter the country
through E-6 visas are exposed to prostitution and “sweatshop” labour or forced into the sex
industry. 79 KWAU-KWH-WMHRCK-DAWU and other NGOs recommended amending
applicable laws to guarantee foreign women access to legal procedures regardless of legality
of their entry into Korea.80 MINBYUN-PSPD-KWAU-KPNJ and other NGOs recommended
enacting relevant laws and regulations to ensure the human rights of immigrant foreign
spouses, etc., and enact a Trafficking Prevention Act to address both inbound and outbound
human trafficking.81 AI also recommended to take measures to protect women migrant
workers and ensure that they are not subjected to discriminatory practices and other abuses;
and to ensure that conditions at detention facilities are consistent with international law and
standards. 82
40. KWAU-KWH-WMHRCK-DAWU and other NGOs also highlighted the situation of
around 120,000 women from third countries married to Korean men, who suffer from racial,
class and gender discrimination. In addition, 50,000 children of foreign wives and women
workers are deprived of schooling. 83
41. In addition, AI reported that since November 2003, the Government has implemented
a series of crack-downs leading to the arrest, detention and deportation of irregular migrant
workers. In this regard, AI also indicated that it has received persistent reports of poor
conditions in detention facilities for migrant workers and reports of abuse, and cruel, inhuman
or degrading treatment or punishment by security personnel against irregular migrant workers
held in detention while they await deportation. According to AI, poor conditions in detention
facilities became tragically evident in a fire at the Yeosu Detention Centre on 12 February
2007, which left 10 persons dead and 17 injured. When the fire broke out the fire alarm
system failed, the sprinkler system did not work, there were fewer guards on duty than
required in law, and the guard closest to respond to the fire did not possess a key to open the
cells of the detainees. The relatives of those killed in the fire were given compensation. The
other detainees were deported back to their countries of origin, many without compensation or
recourse to unpaid wages. 84 Similar concerns were also raised by MINBYUN-PSPD-KWAUKPNJ
and other NGOs. 85
42. ITUC reported that the Government continued to refuse to register the Migrant Trade
Union (MTU). When the MTU filed a legal appeal against the Government’s refusal, the
Seoul High Court ruled in February 2007, that migrant workers have the right to organise
unions, no matter their legal status in the country. 86 AI indicated that the Ministry of Labour
has reportedly appealed against this decision to the Supreme Court. 87 AI also reported that on
27 November 2007, three senior officials of the MTU were arrested and taken to a detention
centre for being “in an irregular or undocumented situation”, and in the morning of 13
December, they were deported in secret and without due process. 88 AI recommended to
protect the human rights of migrant workers, including by respecting their rights to form trade
unions, to be free from cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, ensuring that
they are not subject to arbitrary detention and expulsion without due process, and abuses of
their economic, social and cultural rights. 89
43. MINBYUN-PSPD-KWAU-KPNJ and other NGOs reported that asylum seekers are
deprived of any legal means to maintain their living, while the process for refugee status
determination fails to provide fairness and transparency due to the lack of an independent
screening body and adequate translators. Even recognized refugees still face obstacles in fully
exercising their rights to be protected under the Convention and Protocol relating to the Status
of Refugees, except for the rights to stay and to be employed.90 NHRCK indicated that
refugee recognition procedures should be improved in line with international refugee law.91

III. ACHIEVEMENTS, BEST PRACTICES, CHALLENGES AND CONSTRAINTS
44. NHRCK indicated that over the previous four years, the overall human rights situation
has improved, in particular, with regard to civil and political rights. Discrimination is now
recognized as an important human rights issue in society. However it also noted that while
socially marginalized people and minority groups attract more attention, a widening socioeconomic
gap between the rich and the poor has also diminished the enjoyment of social,
economic, cultural and other rights.92
45. The NHRCK also mentioned that as the percentage of elderly people in the country is
one of the fastest growing in the world, the protection of the rights of elderly people with
regard to social alienation, underemployment, poverty and medical care has emerged as a new
challenge.93

IV. KEY NATIONAL PRIORITIES, INITIATIVES AND COMMITMENTS
n/a

V. CAPACITY-BUILDING AND TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE
46. NHRCK indicated that the Government should develop capacity building and
technical assistance projects, cooperating with the NHRCK and civil society, as it has
voluntarily pledged upon its election to the Human Rights Council. The Government should
also consider how to incorporate a human rights perspective in its official development
assistance. 94
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Notes
1 The stakeholders listed below have contributed information for this summary; the full texts of all original
submissions are available at: www.ohchr.org. (One asterisk denotes a non-governmental organization in
consultative status with the Economic and Social Council. Two asterisks denote a national human rights
institution with “A” status.)
Civil Society
AI Amnesty International, London, United Kingdom, UPR submission, January 2008*
ALRC Asian Legal Resource Centre, Hong Kong, China, UPR submission, January 2008*
GIEACPC Global Initiative to End All of Corporal Punishment of Children, London, United
Kingdom, UPR submission, January 2008
IGLHRC International Gay and Lesbian Human Rights Commission, New York, NY, USA
UPR submission, January 2008
ITUC International Trade Union Confederation, Brussels, Belgium, UPR submission,
January 2008*
KWAU-KWH-WMHRCK-DAWU Korean Women’s Association United (KWAU)*, Korea
Women’s Hotline (KWH), Women Migrant Human Rights Centre in Korea
(WMHRCK), Korea Sexual Violence Relief Centre (KSVRC), Differently Abled
Women United (DAWU) and co-signed by Gwangu Jeonam Women’s Association
United, Gyeong-gi Women’s Associations United, Jeju Association for Women’s
Right, Jeju Women’s Association, Korea Association of Women Theologians, Korea
Women’s Studies Institute, Korean Women Workers Association, Pohang Women’s
Association, Taegu Kyungbuk Women’s ssociations United, The National
Association of Parents for Charm-Education, Women Making Peace, Seoul, Korea,
joint UPR submission, January 2008
MINBYUN-PSPD-KWAU-KPNJ MINBYUN-Lawyers for a Democratic Society*, PSPDPeople’s
Solidarity for Participatory Democracy *, KWAU-Korean Women’s
Association United*, KPNJ-Korean Progressive Network Jinbonet* in association
with Buddhism Human Rights Committee, Civic Action for Social Justice,
Consolidation for Medical Consumer, Cultural Action, Differently Abled Women
United, Disability and Human Rights in Action, Establishment of the centre for
human rights in military, GONGGAM-Korean Public Interest Lawyers Group,
Gyeonggi Women’s Associations United, Intellectual Property Left (IPLeft), Jeju
Association for Women’s Rights, Jeju Women’s Association, Joint Committee with
Migrants in Korea, Korean Medical Action Groups for Health Rights (KFHR), Korea
Health and Medical Workers’ Union (KHMU), Korean Health Professionals for
Action (KHPA), Korea Association of Women Theologians, Korea Buddhist Order
Association Human Rights Committee, Korea Centre for City and Environment
Research, Korea Centre for United Nations Human Rights Policy (KOCUN), Korea
Sexual Violence Relief Centre, Korea Women’s Hotline, Korean Coalition for
Housing Rights, Korean Women Workers Association, Korean Womenlink, Korean
Public & Social Workers’ Union (KPSU), Korea Solidarity for Conscientious
Objection (KSCO), MigrantsTrade Union, MINKAHYUP Human Rights Group,
National Council of Crumbly Man, Pohang Women’s Association, SARANGBANG
Group for Human Rights, Taegu-Kyungbuk Women’s Association United, The
National Association of Parents for Charm-Education, Women Migrant Human
Rights Centre, Seoul, Korea, joint UPR submission, January 2008
National Human Rights Institution
NHRCK National Human Rights Commission of the Republic of Korea, Seoul, Korea, UPR
submission, January 2007 **
2 National Human Rights Commission of Korea, p.1.
3 National Human Rights Commission of Korea, p.5.
4 MINBYUN-Lawyers for a Democratic Society, PSPD-People’s Solidarity for Participatory Democracy ,
KWAU-Korean Women’s Association United, KPNJ-Korean Progressive Network Jinbonetand other NGOs,
Seoul, Korea, joint UPR submission, January 2008, p.1.
5 Asian Legal Resource Centre, Hong Kong, China, UPR submission, January 2008, p.2.
6 National Human Rights Commission of the Republic of Korea, Seoul, Korea, UPR submission, January 2007, p.1.
7 MINBYUN-Lawyers for a Democratic Society, PSPD-People’s Solidarity for Participatory Democracy ,
KWAU-Korean Women’s Association United, KPNJ-Korean Progressive Network Jinbonetand other NGOs,
Seoul, Korea, joint UPR submission, January 2008, p.1.
8 The Korean Women’s Association United, the Korea Women’s Hotline, the Women Migrant Human Rights
Centre in Korea, the Korea Sexual Violence Relief Centre , the Differently Abled Women United and other
NGOs, Seoul, Korea, joint UPR submission, January 2008, p.1.
9 National Human Rights Commission of the Republic of Korea, Seoul, Korea, UPR submission, January 2007,
p.1. For examples of policies not included in the NAP, see also National Human Rights Commission of the
Republic of Korea, Seoul, Korea, UPR submission, January 2007, p.6.
10 MINBYUN-Lawyers for a Democratic Society, PSPD-People’s Solidarity for Participatory Democracy ,
KWAU-Korean Women’s Association United, KPNJ-Korean Progressive Network Jinbonetand other NGOs,
Seoul, Korea, joint UPR submission, January 2008, p.1.
11 National Human Rights Commission of the Republic of Korea, Seoul, Korea, UPR submission, January 2007, p.5.
12 MINBYUN-Lawyers for a Democratic Society, PSPD-People’s Solidarity for Participatory Democracy ,
KWAU-Korean Women’s Association United, KPNJ-Korean Progressive Network Jinbonetand other NGOs,
Seoul, Korea, joint UPR submission, January 2008, p.1.
13 National Human Rights Commission of the Republic of Korea, Seoul, Korea, UPR submission, January 2007, p.4.
14 MINBYUN-Lawyers for a Democratic Society, PSPD-People’s Solidarity for Participatory Democracy ,
KWAU-Korean Women’s Association United, KPNJ-Korean Progressive Network Jinbonetand other NGOs,
Seoul, Korea, joint UPR submission, January 2008, p.4.
15 International Gay and Lesbian Human Rights Commission, New York, NY, USA UPR submission, January 2008, p.1.
16 International Gay and Lesbian Human Rights Commission, New York, NY, USA UPR submission, January 2008, p.2.
17 National Human Rights Commission of the Republic of Korea, Seoul, Korea, UPR submission, January 2007, p.4.
18 The Korean Women’s Association United, Korea Women’s Hotline, Women Migrant Human Rights Centre
in Korea, Korea Sexual Violence Relief Centre, Differently Abled Women United and other NGOs, Seoul,
Korea, joint UPR submission, January 2008, p.4.
19 MINBYUN-Lawyers for a Democratic Society, PSPD-People’s Solidarity for Participatory Democracy ,
KWAU-Korean Women’s Association United, KPNJ-Korean Progressive Network Jinbonetand other NGOs,
Seoul, Korea, joint UPR submission, January 2008, p.5.
20 Amnesty International, London, United Kingdom, UPR submission, January 2008, p.1. See also National
Human Rights Commission of the Republic of Korea, Seoul, Korea, UPR submission, January 2007, p.2.
21 Amnesty International, London, United Kingdom, UPR submission, January 2008, p.3.
22 National Human Rights Commission of the Republic of Korea, Seoul, Korea, UPR submission, January 2007,
p.5; MINBYUN-Lawyers for a Democratic Society, PSPD-People’s Solidarity for Participatory Democracy ,
KWAU-Korean Women’s Association United, KPNJ-Korean Progressive Network Jinbonetand other NGOs,
Seoul, Korea, joint UPR submission, January 2008, p.2.
23 MINBYUN-Lawyers for a Democratic Society, PSPD-People’s Solidarity for Participatory Democracy ,
KWAU-Korean Women’s Association United, KPNJ-Korean Progressive Network Jinbonetand other NGOs,
Seoul, Korea, joint UPR submission, January 2008, p.2.
24 National Human Rights Commission of the Republic of Korea, Seoul, Korea, UPR submission, January 2007, p.2.
25 National Human Rights Commission of the Republic of Korea, Seoul, Korea, UPR submission, January 2007, p.2.
26 Korean Women’s Association United, Korea Women’s Hotline, Women Migrant Human Rights Centre in
Korea, Korea Sexual Violence Relief Centre, Differently Abled Women United, Seoul, Korea, joint UPR
submission, January 2008, pp.2-3.
27 National Human Rights Commission of the Republic of Korea, Seoul, Korea, UPR submission, January 2007,
p.4. See also MINBYUN-Lawyers for a Democratic Society, PSPD-People’s Solidarity for Participatory
Democracy , KWAU-Korean Women’s Association United, KPNJ-Korean Progressive Network Jinbonetand
other NGOs, Seoul, Korea, joint UPR submission, January 2008, p.5.
28 MINBYUN-Lawyers for a Democratic Society, PSPD-People’s Solidarity for Participatory Democracy ,
KWAU-Korean Women’s Association United, KPNJ-Korean Progressive Network Jinbonetand other NGOs,
Seoul, Korea, joint UPR submission, January 2008, p.5.
29 Global Initiative to End All of Corporal Punishment of Children, London, United Kingdom, UPR submission,
January 2008, p.2.
30 Global Initiative to End All of Corporal Punishment of Children, London, United Kingdom, UPR submission,
January 2008, p.2.
31 Global Initiative to End All of Corporal Punishment of Children, London, United Kingdom, UPR submission,
January 2008, p.1.
32 MINBYUN-Lawyers for a Democratic Society, PSPD-People’s Solidarity for Participatory Democracy ,
KWAU-Korean Women’s Association United, KPNJ-Korean Progressive Network Jinbonetand other NGOs,
Seoul, Korea, joint UPR submission, January 2008, p.2.
33 MINBYUN-Lawyers for a Democratic Society, PSPD-People’s Solidarity for Participatory Democracy ,
KWAU-Korean Women’s Association United, KPNJ-Korean Progressive Network Jinbonetand other NGOs,
Seoul, Korea, joint UPR submission, January 2008, p.1.
34 MINBYUN MINBYUN-Lawyers for a Democratic Society, PSPD-People’s Solidarity for Participatory
Democracy , KWAU-Korean Women’s Association United, KPNJ-Korean Progressive Network Jinbonetand
other NGOs, Seoul, Korea, joint UPR submission, January 2008, p.1.
35 National Human Rights Commission of the Republic of Korea, Seoul, Korea, UPR submission, January 2007, p.2.
36 MINBYUN-Lawyers for a Democratic Society, PSPD-People’s Solidarity for Participatory Democracy ,
KWAU-Korean Women’s Association United, KPNJ-Korean Progressive Network Jinbonetand other NGOs,
Seoul, Korea, joint UPR submission, January 2008, p.2.
37 National Human Rights Commission of the Republic of Korea, Seoul, Korea, UPR submission, January 2007, p.2.
38 Korean Women’s Association United, Korea Women’s Hotline, Women Migrant Human Rights Centre in
Korea, Korea Sexual Violence Relief Centre, Differently Abled Women United, Seoul, Korea, joint UPR
submission, January 2008, p.3. See also MINBYUN-Lawyers for a Democratic Society, PSPD-People’s
Solidarity for Participatory Democracy , KWAU-Korean Women’s Association United, KPNJ-Korean
Progressive Network Jinbonetand other NGOs, Seoul, Korea, joint UPR submission, January 2008, p.4.
39 Korean Women’s Association United, Korea Women’s Hotline, Women Migrant Human Rights Centre in
Korea, Korea Sexual Violence Relief Centre, Differently Abled Women United and other NGOs, Seoul, Korea,
joint UPR submission, January 2008, p.3.
40 National Human Rights Commission of the Republic of Korea, Seoul, Korea, UPR submission, January 2007, p.2.
41 MINBYUN-Lawyers for a Democratic Society, PSPD-People’s Solidarity for Participatory Democracy ,
KWAU-Korean Women’s Association United, KPNJ-Korean Progressive Network Jinbonetand other NGOs,
Seoul, Korea, joint UPR submission, January 2008, p.2.
42 National Human Rights Commission of the Republic of Korea, Seoul, Korea, UPR submission, January 2007, p.5.
43 MINBYUN-Lawyers for a Democratic Society, PSPD-People’s Solidarity for Participatory Democracy ,
KWAU-Korean Women’s Association United, KPNJ-Korean Progressive Network Jinbonetand other NGOs,
Seoul, Korea, joint UPR submission, January 2008, p.2.
44 National Human Rights Commission of the Republic of Korea, Seoul, Korea, UPR submission, January 2007, p.2.
45 Amnesty International, London, United Kingdom, UPR submission, January 2008, pp.1-2.
46 Amnesty International, London, United Kingdom, UPR submission, January 2008, pp.1-2.
47 Amnesty International, London, United Kingdom, UPR submission, January 2008, p. 4. See also National
Human Rights Commission of the Republic of Korea, Seoul, Korea, UPR submission, January 2007, p.5.
48 National Human Rights Commission of the Republic of Korea, Seoul, Korea, UPR submission, January 2007, p.2.
49 MINBYUN-Lawyers for a Democratic Society, PSPD-People’s Solidarity for Participatory Democracy ,
KWAU-Korean Women’s Association United, KPNJ-Korean Progressive Network Jinbonetand other NGOs,
Seoul, Korea, joint UPR submission, January 2008, pp.2-3.
50 Korean Women’s Association United, Korea Women’s Hotline, Women Migrant Human Rights Centre in
Korea, Korea Sexual Violence Relief Centre, Differently Abled Women United, Seoul, Korea, joint UPR
submission, January 2008, pp.2-3.
51 MINBYUN-Lawyers for a Democratic Society, PSPD-People’s Solidarity for Participatory Democracy ,
KWAU-Korean Women’s Association United, KPNJ-Korean Progressive Network Jinbonetand other NGOs,
Seoul, Korea, joint UPR submission, January 2008, p.4.
52 National Human Rights Commission of the Republic of Korea, Seoul, Korea, UPR submission, January 2007,
p.3. See also MINBYUN-Lawyers for a Democratic Society, PSPD-People’s Solidarity for Participatory
Democracy , KWAU-Korean Women’s Association United, KPNJ-Korean Progressive Network Jinbonetand
other NGOs, Seoul, Korea, joint UPR submission, January 2008, p.4.
53 Korean Women’s Association United, Korea Women’s Hotline, Women Migrant Human Rights Centre in
Korea, Korea Sexual Violence Relief Centre, Differently Abled Women United, Seoul, Korea, joint UPR
submission, January 2008, pp.1-2.
54 MINBYUN-Lawyers for a Democratic Society, PSPD-People’s Solidarity for Participatory Democracy ,
KWAU-Korean Women’s Association United, KPNJ-Korean Progressive Network Jinbonetand other NGOs,
Seoul, Korea, joint UPR submission, January 2008, p.4.
55 Korean Women’s Association United, Korea Women’s Hotline, Women Migrant Human Rights Centre in
Korea, Korea Sexual Violence Relief Centre, Differently Abled Women United, Seoul, Korea, joint UPR
submission, January 2008, p.2.
56 MINBYUN-Lawyers for a Democratic Society, PSPD-People’s Solidarity for Participatory Democracy ,
KWAU-Korean Women’s Association United, KPNJ-Korean Progressive Network Jinbonetand other NGOs,
Seoul, Korea, joint UPR submission, January 2008, p.5.
57 International Trade Union Confederation, Brussels, Belgium, UPR submission, January 2008, p.1.
58 MINBYUN-Lawyers for a Democratic Society, PSPD-People’s Solidarity for Participatory Democracy ,
KWAU-Korean Women’s Association United, KPNJ-Korean Progressive Network Jinbonetand other NGOs,
Seoul, Korea, joint UPR submission, January 2008, p.4.
59 International Trade Union Confederation, Brussels, Belgium, UPR submission, January 2008, p.1.
60 National Human Rights Commission of the Republic of Korea, Seoul, Korea, UPR submission, January 2007, p.3.
61 National Human Rights Commission of the Republic of Korea, Seoul, Korea, UPR submission, January 2007, p.2.
62 Korean Women’s Association United, Korea Women’s Hotline, Women Migrant Human Rights Centre in
Korea, Korea Sexual Violence Relief Centre, Differently Abled Women United, Seoul, Korea, joint UPR
submission, January 2008, p.3.
63 MINBYUN-Lawyers for a Democratic Society, PSPD-People’s Solidarity for Participatory Democracy ,
KWAU-Korean Women’s Association United, KPNJ-Korean Progressive Network Jinbonetand other NGOs,
Seoul, Korea, joint UPR submission, January 2008, p.3.
64 National Human Rights Commission of the Republic of Korea, Seoul, Korea, UPR submission, January 2007, p.3.
65 National Human Rights Commission of the Republic of Korea, Seoul, Korea, UPR submission, January 2007, p.2.
66 MINBYUN-Lawyers for a Democratic Society, PSPD-People’s Solidarity for Participatory Democracy ,
KWAU-Korean Women’s Association United, KPNJ-Korean Progressive Network Jinbonetand other NGOs,
Seoul, Korea, joint UPR submission, January 2008, pp.3-4.
67 MINBYUN-Lawyers for a Democratic Society, PSPD-People’s Solidarity for Participatory Democracy ,
KWAU-Korean Women’s Association United, KPNJ-Korean Progressive Network Jinbonetand other NGOs,
Seoul, Korea, joint UPR submission, January 2008, p.4.
68 MINBYUN-Lawyers for a Democratic Society, PSPD-People’s Solidarity for Participatory Democracy ,
KWAU-Korean Women’s Association United, KPNJ-Korean Progressive Network Jinbonetand other NGOs,
Seoul, Korea, joint UPR submission, January 2008, p.5.
69 MINBYUN-Lawyers for a Democratic Society, PSPD-People’s Solidarity for Participatory Democracy ,
KWAU-Korean Women’s Association United, KPNJ-Korean Progressive Network Jinbonetand other NGOs,
Seoul, Korea, joint UPR submission, January 2008, p.5.
70 National Human Rights Commission of the Republic of Korea, Seoul, Korea, UPR submission, January 2007, p.3.
71 MINBYUN-Lawyers for a Democratic Society, PSPD-People’s Solidarity for Participatory Democracy ,
KWAU-Korean Women’s Association United, KPNJ-Korean Progressive Network Jinbonetand other NGOs,
Seoul, Korea, joint UPR submission, January 2008, p.5.
72 MINBYUN-Lawyers for a Democratic Society, PSPD-People’s Solidarity for Participatory Democracy ,
KWAU-Korean Women’s Association United, KPNJ-Korean Progressive Network Jinbonetand other NGOs,
Seoul, Korea, joint UPR submission, January 2008, p.5.
73 Korean Women’s Association United, Korea Women’s Hotline, Women Migrant Human Rights Centre in
Korea, Korea Sexual Violence Relief Centre, Differently Abled Women United, Seoul, Korea, joint UPR
submission, January 2008, p.4.
74 National Human Rights Commission of the Republic of Korea, Seoul, Korea, UPR submission, January 2007, p.4.
75 Amnesty International, London, United Kingdom, UPR submission, January 2008, p.2.
76 International Trade Union Confederation, Brussels, Belgium, UPR submission, January 2008, p.4.
77 National Human Rights Commission of the Republic of Korea, Seoul, Korea, UPR submission, January 2007, p.4.
78 Amnesty International, London, United Kingdom, UPR submission, January 2008, p.2. See also Korean
Women’s Association United, Korea Women’s Hotline, Women Migrant Human Rights Centre in Korea, Korea
Sexual Violence Relief Centre, Differently Abled Women United, Seoul, Korea, joint UPR submission, January
2008, pp.4-5.
79 MINBYUN-Lawyers for a Democratic Society, PSPD-People’s Solidarity for Participatory Democracy ,
KWAU-Korean Women’s Association United, KPNJ-Korean Progressive Network Jinbonetand other NGOs,
Seoul, Korea, joint UPR submission, January 2008, pp.4-5.
80 Korean Women’s Association United, Korea Women’s Hotline, Women Migrant Human Rights Centre in
Korea, Korea Sexual Violence Relief Centre, Differently Abled Women United, Seoul, Korea, joint UPR
submission, January 2008, p.5.
81 MINBYUN-Lawyers for a Democratic Society, PSPD-People’s Solidarity for Participatory Democracy ,
KWAU-Korean Women’s Association United, KPNJ-Korean Progressive Network Jinbonetand other NGOs,
Seoul, Korea, joint UPR submission, January 2008, pp.4-5.
82 Amnesty International, London, United Kingdom, UPR submission, January 2008, pp. 3-4.
83 Korean Women’s Association United, Korea Women’s Hotline, Women Migrant Human Rights Centre in
Korea, Korea Sexual Violence Relief Centre, Differently Abled Women United, Seoul, Korea, joint UPR
submission, January 2008, p.5.
84 Amnesty International, London, United Kingdom, UPR submission, January 2008, pp. 2-3.
85 MINBYUN-Lawyers for a Democratic Society, PSPD-People’s Solidarity for Participatory Democracy ,
KWAU-Korean Women’s Association United, KPNJ-Korean Progressive Network Jinbonetand other NGOs,
Seoul, Korea, joint UPR submission, January 2008, p.3.
86 International Trade Union Confederation, Brussels, Belgium, UPR submission, January 2008, p.8. See also
Amnesty International, London, United Kingdom, UPR submission, January 2008, pp.2-3.
87 Amnesty International, London, United Kingdom, UPR submission, January 2008, pp. 2-3.
88 Amnesty International, London, United Kingdom, UPR submission, January 2008, pp. 2-3.
89 Amnesty International, London, United Kingdom, UPR submission, January 2008, pp. 3-4.
90 MINBYUN-Lawyers for a Democratic Society, PSPD-People’s Solidarity for Participatory Democracy ,
KWAU-Korean Women’s Association United, KPNJ-Korean Progressive Network Jinbonetand other NGOs,
Seoul, Korea, joint UPR submission, January 2008, p.3.
91 National Human Rights Commission of the Republic of Korea, Seoul, Korea, UPR submission, January 2007, p.4.
92 National Human Rights Commission of the Republic of Korea, Seoul, Korea, UPR submission, January 2007, p.2.
93 National Human Rights Commission of the Republic of Korea, Seoul, Korea, UPR submission, January 2007, p.1.
94 National Human Rights Commission of the Republic of Korea, Seoul, Korea, UPR submission, January 2007, p.5.